…. Wastewater from oil and gas activities (or “produced
water”) contains compounds that are known to be hazardous to
human health. The volume of produced water has been increasing
in California for decades. Much of this water is disposed via
dangerous unlined ponds that impact groundwater that is
currently or could be used for drinking or agricultural
irrigation in California. While the report notes that
drinking water wells close to oil and gas activities generally
pose greater health risks, the state lacks publicly available
data on which chemicals are found in produced water and
comprehensive reporting on where produced water has been
stored, disposed of, or spilled. The report recommends not only
stronger regulations prohibiting the disposal of this toxic
sludge in unlined produced-water ponds that are prone to
contaminating fresh water, but also better access to
information about where the oil and gas industry has been
disposing of this mess.
… In 2020, watchdog groups first discovered PFAS in certain
pesticides, which directed national attention to whether farm
chemicals might be another source of contamination. How
significant of a PFAS source pesticides might be remains
unresolved, especially because different highly accredited labs
have produced conflicting tests. One initial study found high
levels of PFAS in common pesticides, but when the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) did its own testing on
the same products, it reported none. Environmental groups are
currently contesting the agency’s report. Regardless of
those results, a few things have become clear: Based on the
most commonly used global definition of PFAS, more than 60
pesticides registered by the EPA contain an active ingredient
defined as PFAS. Other pesticides may contain PFAS as
undisclosed additives or from chemicals leaching from the
plastic containers in which they’re stored.
Efforts are underway to combat the persistent sewage odor
plaguing South Bay communities. The city of San Diego placed
large rocks in the Tijuana River Valley. They’re supposed to
help prevent the water from splashing and mitigate the smell of
sewage. “When I go outside I can smell it yeah in the backyard
we can smell it,” said Nancy who lives in Imperial Beach.
Millions of gallons of sewage-contaminated water flows from the
Tijuana river toward Imperial Beach each day. Residents say the
nauseating odor is only getting worse. “Even if you try closing
the windows or the doors the smell still gets into the house so
that’s just an example of how bad it was,” said George
Campillo, an Imperial Beach resident. A new project is meant to
help cutdown on the strong smell. The city of San Diego placed
boulders along the river at Saturn Boulevard, a place known as
a hot spot area for the foul smells.
Chiquita Canyon Landfill is being sued by L.A. County to
address “ongoing environmental and public health hazards caused
by the landfill’s operations,” as well as to seek relief for
“impacted communities under siege,” according to a news release
from 5th District Supervisor Kathryn Barger’s office. The
lawsuit, filed in the United States District Court for the
Central District of California, alleges that the landfill’s
owners — Chiquita Canyon LLC, Chiquita Canyon Inc., and Waste
Connections US Inc. — have failed to control a persistent and
harmful underground smoldering reaction within the landfill,
which has been emitting noxious odors, hazardous gases, and
toxic leachate into nearby communities and the environment for
nearly two years, the release states. … The landfill’s
ongoing pollution problems are the subject of a unilateral
administrative order from the federal Environmental Protection
Agency, which is overseen by joint county, state and federal
agencies, including CalRecycle, the Department of Toxic
Substances Control, the State Water Boards and the South Coast
AQMD, among others.
The San Joaquin Valley has reached a dead end in its fight to
clean up a toxic contaminant from its drinking water, with
residents now facing the prospect of footing the bill for a
mess created by Shell and Dow products. Fresnoland reviewed
internal Shell and Dow memos, court records, and state
documents and interviewed key officials to uncover a
decades-long environmental crisis enabled by both corporate
greed and bureaucratic neglect. The documents show how the
companies’ products contaminated nearly 20% of San
Joaquin Valley drinking water with a substance the
EPA rates as toxic as Agent Orange’s deadliest
dioxin. The companies sold pesticides laced with
1,2,3-trichloropropane (TCP), a manufacturing waste from
gunpowder and plastics production. Shell marketed the farming
products as pure – a scheme that saved them millions in
disposal costs. Over 25 years since discovering the
contamination, state water officials have failed to even map
how far and deep the cancer-causing chemical had spread into
the Valley’s aquifers.
An investigation conducted by a regulatory agency that oversees
regional waterways refutes various claims about water pollution
at two Upvalley waste management sites. The “investigation
report,” released Monday by the California Regional Water
Quality Control Board’s San Francisco Bay Region, responds to
complaints lodged between October 2022 and November of this
year about operations at Clover Flat Landfill south of
Calistoga and the Upper Valley Disposal and Recycling Facility
on Whitehall Lane south of St. Helena. Based on inspections,
water testing, interviews and document reviews, the water board
concluded “that further investigation or pursuit of additional
enforcement against Clover Flat Landfill or the Upper Valley
Facility regarding the complaints is unwarranted.”
A new legal petition filed by more than 170 top environmental
groups demands that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
begin monitoring for microplastics in drinking water, an
essential first step to reining in pollution viewed as one of
the nation’s most pressing public health threats. The scale of
microplastic water pollution, the extent to which the substance
is lodged throughout human bodies, and the many health
implications have come into sharp focus in recent years, but
the EPA still has not taken meaningful action, public health
advocates say. The petition pushes the agency to begin
monitoring microplastics as an emerging contaminant under the
Safe Drinking Water Act in 2026.
Elevated levels of radiation have been detected at the Albany
Bulb, an East Bay landfill that has been converted to an art
park popular with hikers and dog walkers. The radiation was
revealed after a “Gamma Radiation Walkover Survey” by a
hazardous waste specialist hired by the City of Albany to
sample the waste left over by a Richmond chemical plant that
operated there in the 1960s and ’70s. As first reported in the
Los Angeles Times, the test by GSI Environmental, Inc. revealed
10 spots that registered levels of gamma radiation high enough
to merit further measurements. … Blair Robertson,
spokesman for the State Water Resources Control Board in
Sacramento, told the Chronicle that the board is aware of the
results of the report and is waiting for a work plan for
further testing to be drafted in conjunction with the
California Department of Public Health.
President-elect Donald Trump has pledged to slash federal
climate, clean air and clean water regulations during his
second term — an agenda that could target rules governing
everything from auto emissions to power plant pollution to
drinking water standards. … Business groups and many
Republican leaders are cheering Trump’s plan to weaken
environmental protections, arguing they are too strict and harm
the economy. But in states that have focused on tackling
climate change and pollution, attorneys general and lawmakers
are preparing to fight back by filing lawsuits, enacting their
own regulations or staffing up state environmental agencies.
… In Hinkley, water at nine of the 44 wells tested this year
as part of PG&E’s state-mandated cleanup efforts were
found to have chromium-6 levels more than five times
higher than the state’s legal maximum and 2,500 times higher
than what the state deems safe for public
consumption. The regional water board, an arm of the state,
has given the company until 2032 to bring the water’s
chemical content down to legal levels — 36 years after
Brockovich’s lawsuit and 80 years after the toxic substance was
first dumped into the ground by PG&E, the state’s largest
utility. … Experts, lawyers and local residents here said the
long timeline for the cleanup stems partly from the logistical
difficulty of removing a toxic substance that has swirled for
years in the groundwater but also because the effort has been
largely the undertaking of a small regional government water
board in charge of regulating a corporate behemoth.
San Diego’s congressional delegation Tuesday praised President
Joe Biden for including $310 million for the South Bay
International Wastewater Treatment Plant in proposed disaster
relief funding. If passed, the money would add to a previously
awarded $400 million in federal funding to get the plant
running at full capacity and even double its capabilities.
… In May, the local Congressional delegation, including
Vargas and Reps. Scott Peters and Sara Jacobs, both D-San
Diego, and Rep. Mike Levin, D-Dana Point, called on the U.S.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to begin an
investigation into pollutants from the ongoing sewage crisis at
the border.
A water conservation group in California won its bid for a
quick win in the latest phase of its case alleging the unlawful
discharge of pollutants into waters of the US by an equestrian
center. California Coastkeeper Alliance is entitled to summary
judgment because it showed that a livestock facility falls
under the jurisdiction of a permit that wasn’t obtained,
Magistrate Judge Sean C. Riordan of the US District Court for
the Eastern District of California said Monday.
While photos of littered beaches and floating garbage patches
are unsettling, perhaps the most problematic plastic is barely
visible to the naked eye. Called microplastics — chunks less
than 5 millimeters across — these bits have been detected
everywhere from Arctic sea ice to national parks. These
pervasive particles are harder to clean up than larger
plastics, allowing them to accumulate in the environment and
inside living creatures. As their quantities rise, UC Davis
researchers are racing to understand the risks they pose to
ecosystems, animals and humans. “If these things are
getting into our drinking water sources, we
should really care,” said Katie Senft, a staff research
associate at UC Davis’ Tahoe Environmental Research Center,
“especially if they’re not going anywhere and we don’t know the
long-term implications.”
The number was, and is, eye-opening: $10.8 billion. That’s an
estimate issued by city leaders in San Bernardino County for
how much their taxpayers might have to pay, over the next two
decades, to meet possible new standards for cleaning the water
that flows out of their streets and yards and farms and into
the culverts, creeks and tributaries connected to the Santa Ana
River Watershed, a stretch that includes much of San
Bernardino, Orange and Riverside counties. Leaders from 17
cities and agencies in San Bernardino County made that $10.8
billion claim during a public hearing in September, in Cypress,
that involved representatives from all three counties. Their
estimate was part of a broader negotiation over the details of
the region’s next MS4 permit, a federally mandated document
that will set limits on how much pollution can legally flow
into local waters and, by extension, the ocean.
Tiny pieces of plastic waste shed
from food wrappers, grocery bags, clothing, cigarette butts,
tires and paint are invading the environment and every facet of
daily life. Researchers know the plastic particles have even made
it into municipal water supplies, but very little data exists
about the scope of microplastic contamination in drinking
water.
After years of planning, California this year is embarking on a
first-of-its-kind data-gathering mission to illuminate how
prevalent microplastics are in the state’s largest drinking water
sources and help regulators determine whether they are a public
health threat.
A pilot program in the Salinas Valley run remotely out of Los Angeles is offering a test case for how California could provide clean drinking water for isolated rural communities plagued by contaminated groundwater that lack the financial means or expertise to connect to a larger water system.
Martha Guzman recalls those awful
days working on water and other issues as a deputy legislative
secretary for then-Gov. Jerry Brown. California was mired in a
recession and the state’s finances were deep in the red. Parks
were cut, schools were cut, programs were cut to try to balance a
troubled state budget in what she remembers as “that terrible
time.”
She now finds herself in a strikingly different position: As
administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s
Region 9, she has a mandate to address water challenges across
California, Nevada, Arizona and Hawaii and $1 billion to help pay
for it. It is the kind of funding, she said, that is usually
spread out over a decade. Guzman called it the “absolutely
greatest opportunity.”
Innovative efforts to accelerate
restoration of headwater forests and to improve a river for the
benefit of both farmers and fish. Hard-earned lessons for water
agencies from a string of devastating California wildfires.
Efforts to drought-proof a chronically water-short region of
California. And a broad debate surrounding how best to address
persistent challenges facing the Colorado River.
These were among the issues Western Water explored in
2019, and are still worth taking a look at in case you missed
them.
It’s been a year since two devastating wildfires on opposite ends
of California underscored the harsh new realities facing water
districts and cities serving communities in or adjacent to the
state’s fire-prone wildlands. Fire doesn’t just level homes, it
can contaminate water, scorch watersheds, damage delivery systems
and upend an agency’s finances.
Blasted by sun and beaten by waves,
plastic bottles and bags shed fibers and tiny flecks of
microplastic debris that litter the San Francisco Bay where they
can choke the marine life that inadvertently consumes it.
Summer is a good time to take a
break, relax and enjoy some of the great beaches, waterways and
watersheds around California and the West. We hope you’re getting
a chance to do plenty of that this July.
But in the weekly sprint through work, it’s easy to miss
some interesting nuggets you might want to read. So while we’re
taking a publishing break to work on other water articles planned
for later this year, we want to help you catch up on
Western Water stories from the first half of this year
that you might have missed.
Each day, people living on the streets and camping along waterways across California face the same struggle – finding clean drinking water and a place to wash and go to the bathroom.
Some find friendly businesses willing to help, or public restrooms and drinking water fountains. Yet for many homeless people, accessing the water and sanitation that most people take for granted remains a daily struggle.
One of California Gov. Gavin
Newsom’s first actions after taking office was to appoint Wade
Crowfoot as Natural Resources Agency secretary. Then, within
weeks, the governor laid out an ambitious water agenda that
Crowfoot, 45, is now charged with executing.
That agenda includes the governor’s desire for a “fresh approach”
on water, scaling back the conveyance plan in the Sacramento-San
Joaquin Delta and calling for more water recycling, expanded
floodplains in the Central Valley and more groundwater recharge.
Low-income Californians can get help with their phone bills, their natural gas bills and their electric bills. But there’s only limited help available when it comes to water bills.
That could change if the recommendations of a new report are implemented into law. Drafted by the State Water Resources Control Board, the report outlines the possible components of a program to assist low-income households facing rising water bills.
The growing leadership of women in water. The Colorado River’s persistent drought and efforts to sign off on a plan to avert worse shortfalls of water from the river. And in California’s Central Valley, promising solutions to vexing water resource challenges.
These were among the topics that Western Water news explored in 2018.
We’re already planning a full slate of stories for 2019. You can sign up here to be alerted when new stories are published. In the meantime, take a look at what we dove into in 2018:
Disadvantaged communities are those carrying the greatest
economic, health and environmental burdens. They include
poverty, high unemployment, higher risk of asthma and heart
disease, and often limited access to clean, affordable drinking
water.
For decades, cannabis has been grown
in California – hidden away in forested groves or surreptitiously
harvested under the glare of high-intensity indoor lamps in
suburban tract homes.
In the past 20 years, however, cannabis — known more widely as
marijuana – has been moving from being a criminal activity to
gaining legitimacy as one of the hundreds of cash crops in the
state’s $46 billion-dollar agriculture industry, first legalized
for medicinal purposes and this year for recreational use.
As we continue forging ahead in 2018
with our online version of Western Water after 40 years
as a print magazine, we turned our attention to a topic that also
got its start this year: recreational marijuana as a legal use.
State regulators, in the last few years, already had been beefing
up their workforce to tackle the glut in marijuana crops and
combat their impacts to water quality and supply for people, fish
and farming downstream. Thus, even if these impacts were perhaps
unbeknownst to the majority of Californians who approved
Proposition 64 in 2016, we thought it important to see if
anything new had evolved from a water perspective now that
marijuana was legal.
Joaquin Esquivel learned that life is
what happens when you make plans. Esquivel, who holds the public
member slot at the State Water Resources Control Board in
Sacramento, had just closed purchase on a house in Washington
D.C. with his partner when he was tapped by Gov. Jerry Brown a
year ago to fill the Board vacancy.
Esquivel, 35, had spent a decade in Washington, first in several
capacities with then Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., and then as
assistant secretary for federal water policy at the California
Natural Resources Agency. As a member of the State Water Board,
he shares with four other members the difficult task of
ensuring balance to all the uses of California’s water.
A new study could help water
agencies find solutions to the vexing challenges the homeless
face in gaining access to clean water for drinking and
sanitation.
The Santa Ana Watershed Project
Authority (SAWPA) in Southern California has embarked on a
comprehensive and collaborative effort aimed at assessing
strengths and needs as it relates to water services for people
(including the homeless) within its 2,840 square-mile area that
extends from the San Bernardino Mountains to the Orange County
coast.
Microplastics – plastic debris
measuring less than 5 millimeters – are an
increasing water quality concern. They enter waterways and
oceans as industrial microbeads from various consumer
products or larger plastic litter that degrades into small bits.
Microbeads have been used in exfoliating agents, cosmetic washes
and large-scale cleaning processes. Microplastics are used
pharmaceutically for efficient drug delivery to affected sites in
patients’ bodies and by textile companies to create artificial
fibers.
Microplastics disperse easily and widely throughout surface waters and sediments. UV
light, microbes and erosion degrade the tiny fragments, making
them even smaller and more difficult for wastewater treatment
plants to remove.
The particles, usually made of polyethylene or polypropylene
plastic, take thousands of years to biodegrade
naturally. It takes prohibitively high temperatures to
break microplastics down fully. Consequently, most water treatment plants cannot remove
them.
The health effects of consumption are currently under
investigation.
Responses
Many advocacy groups have published lists of products containing
microbeads to curb their purchase and pollution.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency regulates microbeads in
industrial, but not domestic, wastewater.
Federal
law required microbeads to be phased out of rinse-off
cosmetics beginning in July 2017. Dozens of states also
regulate microbeads in products. California has the strictest
limitation, prohibiting even the use of biodegradable microbeads.
Microplastics in California Water
In 2019, the San Francisco Estuary Institute published a
study estimating that 7 trillion pieces of microplastic
enter San Francisco
Bay annually from stormwater runoff, about 300
times the amount in all wastewater treatment effluent entering
the bay.
California lawmakers in 2018 passed a package of bills to raise
awareness of the risks of microplastics and microfibers in the
marine environment and drinking water. As
directed by the legislation, the State Water Resources Control
Board in 2020 adopted an official
definition of microplastics in drinking water and in 2022
developed the world’s standardized methods for testing drinking
water for microplastics.
The water board was expected by late 2023 to begin testing
for microplastics in untreated drinking water sources tapped by
30 of the state’s largest water utilities. After two years, the
testing was expected to extend to treated tap water served
to consumers. A progress report and recommendations for
policy changes or additional research are required by the end of
2025.
Contaminants exist in water supplies from both natural and
manmade sources. Even those chemicals present without human
intervention can be mobilized from introduction of certain
pollutants from both
point and nonpoint sources.
Directly detecting harmful pathogens in water can be expensive,
unreliable and incredibly complicated. Fortunately, certain
organisms are known to consistently coexist with these harmful
microbes which are substantially easier to detect and culture:
coliform bacteria. These generally non-toxic organisms are
frequently used as “indicator
species,” or organisms whose presence demonstrates a
particular feature of its surrounding environment.
Point sources release pollutants from discrete conveyances, such
as a discharge pipe, and are regulated by federal and state
agencies. The main point source dischargers are factories and
sewage treatment plants, which release treated
wastewater.
Problems with polluted stormwater and steps that can be taken to
prevent such pollution and turn what is often viewed as
“nuisance” runoff into a water resource is the focus of this
publication, Stormwater Management: Turning Runoff into a
Resource. The 16-page booklet, funded by a grant from the State
Water Resources Control Board, includes color photos and
graphics, text explaining common stormwater pollutants and
efforts to prevent stormwater runoff through land use/
planning/development – as well as tips for homeowners to reduce
their impacts on stormwater pollution.
20-minute version of the 2012 documentary The Klamath Basin: A
Restoration for the Ages. This DVD is ideal for showing at
community forums and speaking engagements to help the public
understand the complex issues related to complex water management
disputes in the Klamath River Basin. Narrated by actress Frances
Fisher.
For over a century, the Klamath River Basin along the Oregon and
California border has faced complex water management disputes. As
relayed in this 2012, 60-minute public television documentary
narrated by actress Frances Fisher, the water interests range
from the Tribes near the river, to energy producer PacifiCorp,
farmers, municipalities, commercial fishermen, environmentalists
– all bearing legitimate arguments for how to manage the water.
After years of fighting, a groundbreaking compromise may soon
settle the battles with two epic agreements that hold the promise
of peace and fish for the watershed. View an excerpt from the
documentary here.
This 25-minute documentary-style DVD, developed in partnership
with the California Department of Water Resources, provides an
excellent overview of climate change and how it is already
affecting California. The DVD also explains what scientists
anticipate in the future related to sea level rise and
precipitation/runoff changes and explores the efforts that are
underway to plan and adapt to climate.
Salt. In a small amount, it’s a gift from nature. But any doctor
will tell you, if you take in too much salt, you’ll start to have
health problems. The same negative effect is happening to land in
the Central Valley. The problem scientists call “salinity” poses
a growing threat to our food supply, our drinking water quality
and our way of life. The problem of salt buildup and potential –
but costly – solutions are highlighted in this 2008 public
television documentary narrated by comedian Paul Rodriguez.
A 20-minute version of the 2008 public television documentary
Salt of the Earth: Salinity in California’s Central Valley. This
DVD is ideal for showing at community forums and speaking
engagements to help the public understand the complex issues
surrounding the problem of salt build up in the Central Valley
potential – but costly – solutions. Narrated by comedian Paul
Rodriquez.
20-minute DVD that explains the problem with polluted stormwater,
and steps that can be taken to help prevent such pollution and
turn what is often viewed as a “nuisance” into a water resource
through various activities.
Many Californians don’t realize that when they turn on the
faucet, the water that flows out could come from a source close
to home or one hundreds of miles away. Most people take their
water for granted; not thinking about the elaborate systems and
testing that go into delivering clean, plentiful water to
households throughout the state. Where drinking water comes from,
how it’s treated, and what people can do to protect its quality
are highlighted in this 2007 PBS documentary narrated by actress
Wendie Malick.
A 30-minute version of the 2007 PBS documentary Drinking Water:
Quenching the Public Thirst. This DVD is ideal for showing at
community forums and speaking engagements to help the public
understand the complex issues surrounding the elaborate systems
and testing that go into delivering clean, plentiful water to
households throughout the state.
This beautiful 24×36-inch poster, suitable for framing, displays
the rivers, lakes and reservoirs, irrigated farmland, urban areas
and Indian reservations within the Klamath River Watershed. The
map text explains the many issues facing this vast,
15,000-square-mile watershed, including fish restoration;
agricultural water use; and wetlands. Also included are
descriptions of the separate, but linked, Klamath Basin
Restoration Agreement and the Klamath Hydroelectric Agreement,
and the next steps associated with those agreements. Development
of the map was funded by a grant from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service.
As the state’s population continues to grow and traditional water
supplies grow tighter, there is increased interest in reusing
treated wastewater for a variety of activities, including
irrigation of crops, parks and golf courses, groundwater recharge
and industrial uses.
The 28-page Layperson’s Guide to California
Wastewater is an in-depth, easy-to-understand publication
that provides background information on the history of wastewater
treatment and how wastewater is collected, conveyed, treated and
disposed of today. The guide also offers case studies of
different treatment plants and their treatment processes.
As part of the historic Colorado
River Delta, the Salton Sea regularly filled and dried for
thousands of years due to its elevation of 237 feet below
sea level.
The most recent version of the Salton Sea was formed in 1905 when
the Colorado River broke
through a series of dikes and flooded the seabed for two years,
creating California’s largest inland body of water. The
Salton Sea, which is saltier than the Pacific Ocean, includes 130
miles of shoreline and is larger than Lake Tahoe.
This printed issue of Western Water, based on presentations
at the November 3-4, 2010 Water Quality Conference in Ontario,
Calif., looks at constituents of emerging concerns (CECs) – what
is known, what is yet to be determined and the potential
regulatory impacts on drinking water quality.
This issue of Western Water looks at some of the issues
facing drinking water providers, such as compliance with
increasingly stringent treatment requirements, the need to
improve source water quality and the mission of continually
informing consumers about the quality of water they receive.
This issue of Western Water examines PPCPs – what they are, where
they come from and whether the potential exists for them to
become a water quality problem. With the continued emphasis on
water quality and the fact that many water systems in the West
are characterized by flows dominated by effluent contributions,
PPCPs seem likely to capture interest for the foreseeable future.
This issue of Western Water examines the presence of mercury in
the environment and the challenge of limiting the threat posed to
human health and wildlife. In addition to outlining the extent of
the problem and its resistance to conventional pollution
remedies, the article presents a glimpse of some possible courses
of action for what promises to be a long-term problem.
This issue of Western Water examines the problem of perchlorate
contamination and its ramifications on all facets of water
delivery, from the extensive cleanup costs to the search for
alternative water supplies. In addition to discussing the threat
posed by high levels of perchlorate in drinking water, the
article presents examples of areas hard hit by contamination and
analyzes the potential impacts of forthcoming drinking water
standards for perchlorate.
2002 marks the 30th anniversary of one of the most significant
environmental laws in American history, the Clean Water Act
(CWA). The CWA has had remarkable success, reversing years of
neglect and outright abuse of the nation’s waters. But challenges
remain as attention turns to the thorny issue of cleaning up
nonpoint sources of pollution.
